SKS's framtid - The president & the board

To my mind, “styrelsen” should simply be made up out of the five, different presidents of the national organizations. If we do need a president for the SKS as a whole, these five should pick one from amongst themselves to represent the lot, as is the custom in every company board-room.
It does seem unneccessary to have a sixth member, an extra “President” who is not amongst those five, but maybe I’m wrong. If so, please do not hesitate to tell me why.
The same goes for that finance-stuff. Why does SKS have to be a formal unit with its own budget, financing, accountant etc.? It seems we have broken every rule of accountancy since the foundation of SKS with impunity, no-one pays his or her dues directly to SKS, no big – and hardly any small – mutual funds exist, very little, if anything, of these funds has been spent and there does not really seem to be any real need for mutual funds on the whole.
And the whole book-keeping thing has been a desaster; when was the last time SKS’s books were on the up and up? And who has complained?
Never, and no-one...